Abstract

AbstractThick sheet, “dry paint” film parts were thermoformed using different cooling methods and sheet temperatures to determine whether these two parameters had a direct effect on the surface quality of the final part. Although some thermoformers have claimed that applying chilled air after forming “dry paint” film parts improves the gloss of the parts, the data from this study showed that application of chilled air did not have an effect on either the parts' initial gloss or their gloss after time‐dependent hazing. The critical factor in maintaining surface quality in these parts was the maximum temperature reached by the “dry paint” film during heating. In addition, analysis of the data taken on the sheet prior to forming versus that taken on the part after forming demonstrated the importance of validating the surface quality of the as‐received sheet prior to conducting process versus appearance experiments. On the basis of these findings, a recommendation is made for incoming sheet surface quality levels for both process development studies and production applications. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.