Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the neointimal response at 12-month follow-up between ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin, manufactured by Merck) 10/10 mg and Vytorin 10/40 mg after biodegradable polymer Biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 20 patients requiring revascularization were randomly assigned to receive either Vytorin 10/10 mg (n = 9) or Vytorin 10/40 mg (n = 11). Baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed after stent implantation, and follow-up OCT was scheduled at 12 months. We performed follow-up OCT in 18 patients (Vytorin 10/10 mg (n = 9) or Vytorin 10/40 mg (n = 9)). A total of 842 frames and 8552 struts were analyzed at initial and follow-up OCT. At follow-up, the percentage of uncovered struts was not significantly different between both groups (6.61 ± 10.29% vs. 7.57 ± 6.45%, p = 0.815). The percentage of malapposed struts was also similar between both groups (0.69 ± 1.58% vs. 1.55 ± 2.72%, respectively, p = 0.422). Mean percent neointimal hyperplasia area was not significantly different between both groups (6.53 ± 3.26% vs. 6.37 ± 8.96%, p = 0.961). This OCT study showed that both high- and moderate-intensity dosing of Vytorin was associated with relatively lower percentages of uncovered struts and malapposed struts after Biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation in patients with AMI.

Highlights

  • Despite the fact that drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has demonstrated marked reduction in restenosis as compared with the bare metal stent (BMS), the occurrence of late stent thrombosis has been a major concern [1,2,3,4]

  • Study Design and Study Population. This was a prospective, single-centre, randomized study, designed to compare the neointimal response according to the different doses of Vytorin after biodegradable polymer Biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including stent thrombosis (ST)-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

  • During follow-up angiography with optical coherence tomography (OCT), assessment was completely achieved in 18 subjects, nine of the Vytorin 10/10 mg group and nine of the Vytorin 10/40 mg group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the fact that drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has demonstrated marked reduction in restenosis as compared with the bare metal stent (BMS), the occurrence of late stent thrombosis has been a major concern [1,2,3,4]. Animal studies have demonstrated that DES induced greater fibrin deposition, late neointimal thickening, and delayed endothelialisation compared with BMS [5]. Incomplete neointimal coverage of covered struts, the most powerful indicator of endothelialisation, was the best morphometric predictor of late stent thrombosis in a pathologic study [6]. Sci. 2018, 8, 1968 with very late stent thrombosis, occurring beyond one year after DES implantation [7,8]. Assessment of appropriate endothelialisation and late apposition status of DES is the key factor for the prevention of stent thrombosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call