Abstract

Quantum processors rely on classical electronic controllers to manipulate and read out the quantum state. As the performance of the quantum processor improves, non-idealities in the classical controller can become the performance bottleneck for the whole quantum computer. To prevent such limitation, this paper presents a systematic study of the impact of the classical electrical signals on the qubit fidelity. All operations, i.e. single-qubit rotations, two-qubit gates and read-out, are considered, in the presence of errors in the control electronics, such as static, dynamic, systematic and random errors. Although the presented study could be extended to any qubit technology, it currently focuses on single-electron spin qubits, because of several advantages, such as purely electrical control and long coherence times, and for their potential for large-scale integration. As a result of this study, detailed electrical specifications for the classical control electronics for a given qubit fidelity can be derived, as demonstrated with specific case studies. We also discuss the effect on qubit fidelity of the performance of the general-purpose room-temperature equipment that is typically employed to control the few qubits available today. Ultimately, we show that tailor-made electronic controllers can achieve significantly lower power, cost and size, as required to support the scaling up of quantum computers.

Highlights

  • Quantum computers have the potential to solve problems that are intractable even for the most powerful supercomputers [1]

  • The presented study could be extended to any qubit technology, it currently focuses on singleelectron spin qubits, because of several advantages, such as purely electrical control and long coherence times, and for their potential for large-scale integration

  • A quantum computer operates by processing the information stored in quantum bits, which are organized in a quantum processor

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Quantum computers have the potential to solve problems that are intractable even for the most powerful supercomputers [1]. The proposed approach can be extended to any quantum technology, such as NMR [36,37,38], ion traps [8,39], superconducting qubits [7,40,41], or nitrogenvacancy (N-V) centers in diamond [42], we focus on the specific case of single-electron spin qubits This qubit technology offers promising prospects for large-scale quantum computing, due to the long coherence times [12,43], the fully electrical control [44,45], and the potential integration of the quantum processor with a classical controller on a single chip fabricated using standard microelectronic technologies [46].

The quantum processor
The classical electronic controller
METHODS
Fidelity of a single-qubit operation
Specifications for the idle operation and qubit-frequency multiplexing
Case study of the specifications for a single-qubit operation
Fidelity of a two-qubit operation
Specifications for the idle operation
Case study of the specifications for a two-qubit operation
Fidelity for qubit readout
Specifications for the electronics controlling the spin to charge conversion
Specifications for the electronics processing the readout signal
Case study of the specifications for a qubit readout
DISCUSSION
44 GHz 40 GHz
Findings
VIII. CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.