Impact of choice of skin preparation solution in cardiac surgery on rate of surgical site infection: a propensity score matched analysis.

Abstract

Antiseptic skin preparations containing chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine are routinely used to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This study assesses the efficacy of two alcohol-based solutions, 2% chlorhexidine-alcohol and 10% povidone iodine-alcohol, on the incidence of cardiac SSI. A total of 738 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery had skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropanol (ChloraPrep, BD Ltd, UK) were propensity matched to 738 patients with skin prepared with 10% povidone-iodine in 30% industrial methylated spirit (Videne Alcoholic Tincture, Ecolab Ltd, UK). Continuous, prospective SSI surveillance data were collected for all these patients. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected perioperative data was performed. The overall rate of SSI was similar in the chlorhexidine-alcohol and povidone-iodine-alcohol groups (3.3% versus 3.8%; P = 0.14; relative risk [RR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-1.78). Superficial (1.2% versus 1.8%; P = 0.18; RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.48-1.80) and deep incisional (1.2% versus 1.6%; P = 0.24) SSI rates were also similar with 10% povidone-iodine-alcohol being marginally more effective against organ-space infections (0.8% versus 0.4%; P = 0.05; RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.20-1.01). Our analysis confirms that alcohol-based skin preparation in cardiac surgery with povidone-iodine reduces the incidence of organ-space infections with no significant superiority in preventing incisional SSI compared with chlorhexidine-alcohol.