Abstract

This article deals with whether the most recent version of the OECD Commentary should be used when interpreting a double taxation convention or the version that was in force at the time the tax treaty was concluded. The author generally prefers the second position. He rejects the dynamic interpretation of the tax treaty because of the risk of violating democratic standards, inter alia, the decisive role of the parliament in the process of creating tax law.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.