IMPACT OF CELIPROLOL THERAPY ON BLOOD PRESSURE AND HEART RATE IN PATIENTS WITH VASCULAR EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME

Abstract

Objective: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is an inherited connective tissue disorder characterized by arterial fragility. Celiprolol is a beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist with partial beta2 agonist activity that has been shown to reduce rates of vascular events in this setting, though the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Aim of the present study was to assess the impact of Celiprolol on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in patients with vEDS. Design and method: Patients with genetically confirmed disease referred to our Institution between 2011 and 2022 were divided into two groups according to whether or not they were on Celiprolol therapy. The former were included if on Celiprolol at the dose of 400 mg daily for at least 12 months. Each participant underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurement, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and pulse wave analysis (PWA) of the radial artery with calculation of central pulse pressure (PP) and augmentation index (AIx). Results: Overall, 18 patients (11 females) were included. Mean age was 36 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.1 kg/m2. Eleven patients were on Celiprolol therapy. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of age, sex, BMI, and presence of hypertension (p>0.05). Patients on Celiprolol therapy displayed higher values of systolic BP (SBP) (124 vs 113 mmHg; p = 0.128), diastolic BP (DBP) (76 vs 67 mmHg; p = 0.236), mean BP (92 vs 83 mmHg; p = 0.173), and HR at office BP measurement, as well as lower AIx (126 vs 140%; p = 0.176) at PWA, although the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant difference was found for all ABPM parameters (24-h, day-time, and night-time SBP, DBP, mean BP, and HR), as well as central SBP, central DBP, central mean BP, and PP at PWA between groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: Our study suggests little impact of Celiprolol therapy on both BP and HR in patients with vEDS, which hints additional mechanisms behind its protective effect in this clinical setting. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to clarify these aspects.