Abstract
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and its negative prognostic impact on the morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients has been well described. In patients with Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS), mortality rates can reach up to 20% and poor outcomes have been reported in people with older age, presence of comorbid conditions and concurrent infections. However, the impact of atrial fibrillation on the hospital outcomes of patients admitted with HHS has not been well documented.Objective: We wanted to compare the outcomes for HHS hospitalizations for patients with and without Atrial fibrillation.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016 and 2017. About 42 740 hospitalizations who had HHS as primary diagnosis were enrolled and further stratified based on the presence or absence of Atrial Fibrillation as secondary diagnosis using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, total Hospital charges, Sepsis, Septic Shock, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), and Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF). Multivariate regression analysis was done to adjust for confounders.Results: Out of the 42 740 hospitalizations with HHS, about 3 295 had Atrial Fibrillation. The in-hospital mortality for patients with HHS was 305 overall, out of which 60 patients had Atrial Fibrillation as secondary diagnosis. Compared with patients without Atrial Fibrillation, patients with Atrial Fibrillation had a similar in- hospital mortality (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.39–1.52, p=0.45) when adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Patients with HHS and Atrial Fibrillation had similar length of hospital stay, total Hospital charges, rate of Sepsis, Septic Shock, AKI, and ARF in comparison to patients without Atrial Fibrillation.Conclusion: Our study suggests that the presence of atrial fibrillation in hospitalized HHS patients is not associated with increased mortality or longer duration of hospital stay. This data is essential since it helps identify HHS patients with increased risk of complications. As previous reports have suggested that AF, especially of new onset in critically ill patients is a marker of increased disease severity, the lack of such impact in patients with HHS requires further studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.