Abstract

The systematic establishment of coastal ocean observation systems adopting cutting-edge technology, such as High Frequency (HF) radar, satellite sensing and gliders, has provided unprecedented opportunities for improving and assessing ocean model hindcasts and forecasts. We assess the impact of assimilating high quality HF radar observations covering the Middle Atlantic Bight (MAB) into an operational New York Harbor Observation and Prediction System (NYHOPS). A nudging or Newtonian damping scheme is developed to assimilate the HF radar surface currents during operational NYHOPS observation-based spin-up (-24 to 0 forecast h). The effectiveness of data assimilation (DA) is evaluated by comparisons to surface currents derived from Lagrangian drifters tracked during a total 67 days in 2010 and 2011. The impact of DA on NYHOPS's ability to simulate surface currents correctly during both the NYHOPS hindcast (-24 to 0 h) and free forecast (0 to 24 h) periods is analyzed quantitatively. In the MAB, DA decreased the root-mean-square-difference (RMSD) between the NYHOPS hindcast and the HF radar surface current components by approximately 3 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> between Jun 9 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> , 2011 and Jul 21 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">st</sup> , 2011. Compared to historic current-meter-data estimates of the dominant semidiurnal tidal current constituent, harmonic analysis of the NYHOPS surface currents after DA shows an average 1.0 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> improvement in the semimajor axis, a 0.2 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> improvement in the semi-minor axis, a 10° decrease in the averaged phase, and a 13° decrease in the average ellipse orientation estimates. The average RMSD between NYHOPS hindcast surface currents and those derived along the observed drifter trajectories was 13.6 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , which, after DA, decreased by 1.1 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> (8%). The benefit of DA during hindcast/spinup extended to the free forecast period: a decrease of approximately 5% from 21 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> RMSD without DA. The average mean-vector-velocity-difference (MVVD) between surface currents from the NYHOPS hindcast with DA and currents derived along drifter trajectories was 3.6 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , a 1.5 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> decrease compared with that of NYHOPS without DA. Again, the benefit extended to the free forecast period, with the MVVD error decreasing from 5 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> to 4 cm s <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> . Finally, averaged over a set of 43 particle tracking runs, the separation distance between numerical particle trajectories based on the NYHOPS currents versus observed drifter trajectories also decreased after DA (by 7% per five hindcast days and 10% per one forecast day). These results indicate that DA of HF radar currents onto operational forecast models can improve the skill of such models and, in extension, their benefit to society through, for example, more accurate search and rescue path planning.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.