Abstract
Most damage to buildings across the contiguous United States, in terms of number and total cost, is caused by gusts in convective events associated with thunderstorms. Their assessment relies on the integrity of meteorological observations. This study examines the impact on risk due to valid gust observations culled erroneously by the real-time quality control algorithm of the US Automated Surface Observation System (ASOS) after 2013. ASOS data before 2014 are used to simulate the effect of this algorithm at 450 well-exposed stations distributed across the contiguous USA. The peak gust is culled in around 10% of these events causing significant underestimates of extreme gusts. The full ASOS record, 2000–2021, is used to estimate and map the 50-year mean recurrence interval (MRI) gust speeds, the conventional metric for structural design. It is concluded that recovery of erroneously culled observations is not possible, so the only practical option to eliminate underestimation is to ensure that the 50-year MRI gust speed at any given station is not less than the mean for nearby surrounding stations. This also affects stations where values are legitimately lower than their neighbors, which represents the price that must be paid to eliminate unacceptable risk.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
