Abstract

Background and Aims: Exercise training (ET) is a critical component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), but it remains underused. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients who completed ET (A-T), those who accepted ET but did not complete it (A-NT), and those who did not accept to undergo it (R-NT), and to analyze reasons for rejecting or not completing ET.Methods and Results: A unicenter ambispective observational registry study of 497 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was carried out in Barcelona, Spain, from 2016 to 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for ACS, or need for revascularization during follow-up. Multivariable analysis was carried out to identify variables independently associated with the primary outcome. Initially, 70% of patients accepted participating in the ET, but only 50.5% completed it. The A-T group were younger and had fewer comorbidities. Baseline characteristics in A-NT and R-NT groups were very similar. The main reason for not undergoing or completing ET was rejection (reason unknown) or work/schedule incompatibility. The median follow-up period was 31 months. Both the composite primary endpoint and mortality were significantly lower in the A-T group compared to the A-NT and R-NT (primary endpoint: 3.6% vs. 23.2% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001, respectively; mortality: 0.8% vs. 9.1% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001; respectively). During multivariable analysis, the only variables that remained statistically significant with the composite endpoint were ET completion, previous ACS, and anemia.Conclusion: Completion of ET after ACS was associated with improved prognosis. Only half of the patients completed the ET program, with the leading reasons for not completing it being refusal (reason unknown) and work/schedule incompatibility. These results highlight the need to focus on the needs of patients in order to guarantee that structural barriers to ET no longer exist.

Highlights

  • According to the World Health Organization, ischemic heart disease was the top cause of death in 2000 and 2019, responsible for 16% of total deaths each year

  • This study aimed to assess whether there were epidemiological differences between patients referred for Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) according to exercise compliance and initial attitude toward exercise training (ET), analyze the reasons for rejecting or not completing ET, and explore the prognostic impact of each group

  • All patients from our health area were invited to participate in the CR program (CRP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, ischemic heart disease was the top cause of death in 2000 and 2019, responsible for 16% of total deaths each year. Patient-centered care (PCC) has been proposed as a central component for a sustainable, affordable, and high-quality healthcare approach. It underlines the importance of understanding the patient’s capabilities and resources in order to engage the patient to participate in care (Ekman et al, 2011). To provide optimal PCC, it is critical to know why patients choose not to participate in CR. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients who completed ET (A-T), those who accepted ET but did not complete it (A-NT), and those who did not accept to undergo it (R-NT), and to analyze reasons for rejecting or not completing ET

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call