Impact of an aggressive stenting strategy on initial and one-year follow-up costs in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.

Abstract

Although stents have been shown in randomised trials to reduce restenosis rates compared with balloon angioplasty, there are concerns regarding the cost-effectiveness of an aggressive stenting strategy. Stents were shown to increase medical costs over 12 months in the early trials. Our aim was to determine the economic impact of an aggressive stenting strategy using current stenting techniques compared with a conservative stenting strategy. Initial and one year follow-up costs were determined in all patients who underwent successful revascularisation during June to December 1996 (aggressive stenting, n = 401), and compared to all patients treated in the corresponding months in 1995 (conservative stenting, n = 347). All patients had clinical follow-up for one year. The proportion of patients receiving a stent increased from 22.5% in 1995 to 66.1% in 1996 (p < 0.0001). Requirement for repeat procedures in the 1995 group compared with 1996 was coronary angiography in 31% vs 16% (p < 0.001), coronary angioplasty in 11% vs 6% (p = 0.0044) and bypass surgery in 4.8% vs 2.5% (p = 0.054). The mean initial cost of the procedure was higher in the aggressive stenting group ($4319 +/- 1276 in 1995 vs $5131 +/- 1491 in 1996, p < 0.0001), but after 12 months follow-up, total medical costs were equivalent ($5975 +/- 4143 in 1995 vs $5994 +/- 3476 in 1996, p = NS). An aggressive coronary stenting strategy is associated with higher initial costs compared with a conservative strategy, but lower costs during follow-up due to reduced need for repeat procedures, resulting in equivalent one year total medical costs.