Abstract

This paper studies the physical layer’s impact on the blocking probability and energy consumption of wide-area dynamic elastic optical networks (EONs). For this purpose, we consider five network configurations, each named with a network configuration identifier (NCI) from 1 to 5, for which the Routing, Modulation Level, and Spectrum Assignment (RMLSA) problem is solved. NCI 1–4 are transparent configurations based on all-EDFA, hybrid Raman/EDFA amplifiers (with different Raman gain ratio $\Gamma _{R}$ ), all-DFRA, and alternating span configuration (EDFA and DFRA). NCI 5 is a translucent configuration based on all-EDFA and 3R regenerators. We model the physical layer for every network configuration to determine the maximum achievable reach of optical signals. Employing simulation, we calculate the blocking probability and the energy consumption of the different network configurations. In terms of blocking, our results show that NCI 2 and 3 offer the lowest blocking probability, with at least 1 and 3 orders of magnitude of difference with respect to NCI 1 and 5 at high and low traffic loads, respectively. In terms of energy consumption, the best performing alternatives are the ones with the worst blocking (NCI 1), while NCI 3 exhibits the highest energy consumption with NCI $2\,\,\Gamma _{R}=0.75$ following closely. This situation highlights a clear trade-off between blocking performance and energy cost that must be considered when designing a dynamic EON. Thus, we identify NCI 2 using $\Gamma _{R}=0.25$ as a promising alternative to reduce the blocking probability significantly in wide-area dynamic EONs without a prohibitive increase in energy consumption.

Highlights

  • E LASTIC Optical Network (EON) architectures were proposed as a new paradigm to overcome the potential capacity crunch of legacy wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks [1], [2]

  • We have studied the impact of the physical layer implementation on the blocking probability and energy consumption of dynamic EONs, using two network topologies and considering transparent and translucent network configurations

  • For NSFNet, the limited reach dominated the blocking in network configuration identifier (NCI) 1 and 5 of the available modulations formats, while for NCI 2, 3, and 4, the blocking was driven by lack of capacity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

E LASTIC Optical Network (EON) architectures were proposed as a new paradigm to overcome the potential capacity crunch of legacy wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks [1], [2]. EONs divide the frequency spectrum into small slot units (Frequency Slot Units - FSU), usually of 12.5 or 6.25 GHz spectral width [3], which are flexibly allocated to the different traffic demands [4]. In this way, spectral resources are managed more efficiently than current fixed grid WDM networks. When dynamically operated (connection requests are established on-demand and released after transmission [5]), EONs have the.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.