Abstract

The aim of this paper was to compare the annual economic impact of a large-scale bio-coal pellet plant by raw material specifically for the Finnish Lakeland region. In this study, the total production volume of the theoretical plant was 200,000 tons per year and the raw wood materials used were birch pulpwood, spruce pulpwood, pine pulpwood, and energy wood. These wood materials were young delimbed wood from early thinnings. The main goal of the paper was to illustrate that the energy content differences of raw wood materials affect the economic profitability of a bio-coal pellet plant at regional level. In this case, wood type also has a regional economic impact, which the pellet plant can influence through its raw wood material choices. The raw material comparison was based on measured data and not computational or literary data alone. The study found that lower solid wood energy densities caused higher relative costs for the total supply chain. A parallel phenomenon occurred with the required gross margin of the pellets, where lower energy content caused higher required gross margin for pellet sales. The gross margin was also sensitivity analyzed at different discount rates from 5% to 20%. At each required discount rate, the highest annual economic impact on the region was found for birch pellets, with values of 36.95 - 42.66 million � Spruce pellets had the smallest annual economic impact, although it had the highest final pellet price in the same cases. The different economic effects were caused by the energy volumes sold.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe use of fossil fuels is still high in the world, causing global warming as a re-

  • The calculations in this paper show that the final price of bringing the bio-coal pellets to the market is greatly affected by the raw wood material used

  • This study investigated the direct annual economic impact of a large-scale bio-coal pellet plant by raw material for a specific Finnish region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of fossil fuels is still high in the world, causing global warming as a re-. A lot of new technologies are being developed to replace or at least reduce the use of fossil fuels. Biomass is widely considered as an ideal energy resource for replacement of fossil fuels due to the zero carbon emission and renewable characteristics [2]. Biomass has a low energy density, which causes high transportation and handling costs. The key to resolving this problem is locating the energy conversion process close to a concentrated source of biomass [3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call