Impact of Alternative Growth Supplements on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Abstract

PurposeThe accurate detection of antibiotic susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae) is of great importance for the treatment of patients with gonorrhea as well as to hinder the progress of drug resistance. To promote the application of gonococcal antibiotic susceptibility monitoring in primary hospitals and remote medical institutions, this study evaluated the effect of alternative growth supplements on the antibiotic susceptibility testing of N. gonorrhoeae isolates.MethodsWe divided the antimicrobial-containing media into three groups by adding different growth supplements (sterile defibrinated sheep blood, bovine hemoglobin, and Vitox). We tested the antimicrobial susceptibility of 80 N. gonorrhoeae isolates in different groups against eight antibiotics. Nonparametric signed-rank tests were utilized to compare the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results of each group. Taking the MIC results of Vitox group as expected, the essential agreement (EA) and category agreement (CA) of the other two groups were calculated.ResultsFor the group using sheep blood as growth supplements, the EA values and CA values of each antibiotic were above 90.00% and minor error rates were less than 7.00%. No very major error and major error were observed. For the group using hemoglobin as growth supplements, the EA values of the susceptibility results of zoliflodacin, penicillin, and ceftriaxone were lower than 90.00%. The overall MIC results of using hemoglobin as a growth supplement were higher than those of sheep blood and Vitox in the susceptibility testing of these three antibiotics.ConclusionCompared with the expected results, sheep blood may be considered for the use as an alternative material for N. gonorrhoeae antibiotics susceptibility surveillance, while hemoglobin may not be suitable for supplement to antimicrobial-containing medium.