Abstract
608 Background: Previous analyses of the ATAC trial demonstrated initial adjuvant treatment with anastrozole (A) has significant efficacy and tolerability advantages over tamoxifen (T). At 33 months’ median follow-up there was a potential interaction with previous chemotherapy, which was less apparent at 47 months’ median follow-up. When the effects of different chemotherapy regimens were retrospectively evaluated at 47 months, the apparent interaction was limited to patients who had received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Here we evaluate the results from the ATAC trial at 68 months’ median follow-up to assess the effect of different chemotherapy regimens on time to recurrence (TTR) over the full 5-year treatment period. Methods: Chemotherapy regimens were (1) CMF, (2) anthracycline (AC)-containing regimens (AC, cyclophosphamide ± 5-fluorouracil), (3) other chemotherapies, including taxane-containing combinations. The impact of regimens on TTR was calculated and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Consistent with the 47-month analysis, superiority for TTR was maintained for A versus T in the AC-containing and taxane-containing subgroups. Advantages for A are now evident with CMF. Adjusting for chemotherapy type had only a minimal effect on TTR. Conclusions: Despite the previously reported interaction within the CMF-group, additional follow-up has confirmed that the benefits of A over T are maintained regardless of the type of chemotherapy given. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration AstraZeneca AstraZeneca
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.