Abstract

Evaluate the impact of adding mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) measurements to the Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging Reporting and Data System MRI (O-RADS MRI) scoring for adnexal lesion characterization using a combined O-RADS MRI/ADCmean reading approach. This prospective study included 90 women who underwent pelvic MRI for adnexal lesions diagnosis and characterization. Two readers scored the adnexal lesions using the O-RADS MRI scoring independently and in consensus. A third reader calculated ADCmean measurements. The final diagnoses were determined by histo-pathology (n = 77) or follow-up imaging (n = 13). Areas under the curves (AUCs) and diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for the O-RADS MRI scoring, ADCmean, and combined O-RADS MRI/ADCmean thresholds. P-value <0.05 was significant. 116 adnexal lesions (71 benign, 45 malignant) were analyzed. The optimal thresholds to predict malignant adnexal lesions were O-RADS MRI score >3 and ADCmean value ≤1.08×10-3 mm2/s (AUC 0.926 and 0.823; sensitivity 97.7% and 95.5%; specificity 87.3% and 68%; positive predictive value (PPV) 83% and 66.2%; positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 7.7 and 3.08, respectively). Compared to the O-RADS MRI scoring, a combined threshold of O-RADS MRI >3/ADCmean ≤1.08×10-3 mm2/s, yielded a reduction of false positives, a significant increase in the specificity (97.1%, p=0.005), PPV (95.4%, p=0.002), and PLR (33.1, p <0.0001), and non-significant change in the AUC (0.953, p=0.252), and sensitivity (93.3%, p=0.467). The diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI scoring to characterize adnexal lesions could be improved by adding the ADCmean values through reducing false positives, increasing specificity, and maintaining good sensitivity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call