Abstract
Research questionIs race/ethnicity or access to care, as defined by insurance coverage, distance to the clinic and zip code (postal code), associated with care discontinuation following IVF? DesignA retrospective cohort study of 878 diverse women who underwent 1571 IVF cycles from 2014 to 2018 at a Southeastern academic medical centre was performed. Women were divided into low (LAC) and high (HAC) access to care groups. HAC was defined as possessing IVF insurance coverage, living ≤25 miles from the clinic, and living in a zip code with a median income ≥$75,000. Access groups and racial/ethnic groups were compared for differences in relative risk of care discontinuation following an unsuccessful IVF cycle. ResultsWomen with HAC had a poorer IVF prognosis than the LAC group, which possibly impacted the association with care discontinuation. Distance to the clinic, but not insurance coverage or zip code, was associated with increased risk of care discontinuation. Among women ≤34 years, HAC showed some evidence of an association with an increased risk of care discontinuation (adjusted relative risk 2.5, 95% confidence interval 0.8–8.1). Despite having higher rates of insurance coverage (51.2% versus 36.5%), non-Hispanic Black women were more likely to discontinue care (58.3% versus 40.2%) and less likely to achieve a live birth (53.0% versus 68.0%) than non-Hispanic White women. ConclusionsIdentification as non-Hispanic Black, and distance to the clinic, but not insurance coverage or zip code, were associated with increased risk of care discontinuation following an unsuccessful IVF cycle. In women ≤34 years old, HAC may be associated with a higher rate of care discontinuation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.