Abstract
PurposeThe current study investigated the impact of abdominal compression on motion and the delivered dose during non-gated, magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases. MethodsThirty-one patients with adrenal gland metastases treated to 45–60 Gy in 3–8 fractions on a 1.5 T MRI-linac were included in the study. The patients were breathing freely (n = 14) or with motion restricted by using an abdominal compression belt (n = 17). The time-resolved position of the target in online 2D cine MR images acquired during treatment was assessed and used to estimate the dose delivered to the GTV and abutting luminal organs at risk (OAR). ResultsThe median (range) 3D root-mean-square target position error was significantly higher in patients treated without a compression belt [2.9 (1.9–5.6) mm] compared to patients using the belt [2.1 (1.2–3.5) mm] (P < 0.01). The median (range) GTV V95% was significantly reduced from planned 98.6 (65.9–100) % to delivered 96.5 (64.5–99.9) % due to motion (P < 0.01). Most prominent dose reductions were found in patients showing either large target drift or respiration motion and were mainly treated without abdominal compression. Motion did not lead to an increased number of constraint violations for luminal OAR. ConclusionsAcceptable target coverage and dose to OAR was observed in the vast majority of patients despite intra-fractional motion during adaptive MRI-guided radiation ablation. The use of abdominal compression significantly reduced the target position error and prevented the most prominent target coverage degradations and is, therefore, recommended as motion management at MRI-linacs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.