Abstract

One-stop clinics have emerged as a tool to optimize the therapeutic management of cancer patients. The main purpose of this study was to assess the role of the one-stop hematuria clinic (OSHC), as compared to a conventional clinic (CC), on the overall and disease-free survival of patients with bladder cancer. A five-year follow-up retrospective and single-center study was conducted in patients with primary bladder tumor diagnosed between 2006 and 2015. The primary outcomes were five-year overall survival and one-year relapse rate. A total of 394 patients (160 in OSHC and 234 in CC) were included. No differences were observed in terms of age, sex, smoking habit or risk group between the OSHC and CC groups. The average times from first symptom to diagnosis (24.9 ± 29.1 vs. 100.7 ± 93.6 days) and from first symptom to treatment (70.2 ± 34.0 vs. 155.0 ± 102.9 days) were significantly lower in the OSHC group than in the CC group (p < 0.001 each). There was no significant difference in the five-year survival rate between OSHC and CC (103/160 vs. 150/234, respectively; p = 0.951), although the proportion of relapses during the first year was significantly lower in the OSHC group (35/139, 25.2%) than in the CC one (74/195, 38.0%; p = 0.02). OSHC significantly reduced the diagnosis and treatment times. The early-relapse rate was significantly lower in the OSHC group, although the five-year survival rate was similar.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call