Impact of a mature palliative service for patients with lung cancer admitted to the ICU.

Abstract

102 Background: In 2012 ASCO made the clinical recommendation for patients with stage IV solid organ cancer to receive palliative care consultation (PCC) at the time of detection. This was intended to increase utilization and effectiveness of palliative care. In this study, we estimate the proportion and impact of late "brink of death" PCC for patients with stage III-IV lung cancer admitted to the ICU of a hospital with a Joint Commission approved palliative care program. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with advanced lung cancer (stage III-IV) admitted to ICU in 2015-17. IRB approval was obtained. There were no exclusion criteria within this population. Areas assessed were age, stage, reason for admission, interventions, disposition, length of stay, days in the intensive care unit, palliative care consultation, code status, and documented end of life discussion. Results: A total of 13 patient met inclusion criteria. They were 38% male 62% female with a mean age of 67 years (SD: 14.9). All had prior diagnosis of advanced lung cancer and 92% were stage IV. The most common indication for admission was sepsis (38%). Less than half (46%) had a PCC, and fewer (31%) had a documented end of life care discussion. Even in the minority of patients with PCC, 33% received the PCC on day of death. Full code status was maintained in 77%. 53% expired during admission with only 57% of those that died having palliative care discussion. Conclusions: Even in a mature TJC certified PCC program, less than half of these terminally ill patients received a PCC. There is a chasm between ASCO's goal of early PCC and the reality of palliative care utilization in ICU admitted patients with advanced lung cancer. A possible solution is to initiate triggered palliative consultation for this high mortality population upon admission, with possible expansion to other terminally ill groups. In a world of electronic medical records, it should be possible to arrange a system to flag these patients for direct review by the palliative team to determine appropriateness and then notify the primary team in order to coordinate care.[Table: see text]