Abstract
AbstractIntroductionPatient care simulations (PCS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) allow pharmacy students to practice communication. Feedback can help improve communication, but the impact over time is not well understood.ObjectiveThis study investigated the impact of a feedback strategy on pharmacy students' communication skills over three PCS. It also evaluated the alignment between students' self‐scoring and faculty scoring.MethodsPharmacy students participated in three sessions (PCS1, OSCE, and PCS3) that were focused on the affective domain. Individualized numerical and narrative feedback was provided to students on their performance after PCS1. Students' communication was scored by faculty graders out of an 18‐point validated rubric. Students self‐scored their communication with the same rubric. Faculty and student scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement.ResultsIn PCS1, 82 students scored an average of 15.41 ± 2.14 for faculty scores and 16.06 ± 1.55 for self‐graded scores (0.36, p < 0.001). In the OSCE, 81 students had an average of 15.93 ± 1.86 for faculty scores and 16.45 ± 1.35 for self‐graded scores (0.1, p = 0.18). In PCS3, 74 students scored an average of 15.22 ± 2.15 for faculty scores and 16.25 ± 1.44 for self‐graded scores (0.14, p = 0.08). A correlation between faculty and student scores was seen for PCS1. Over the three sessions, no significant differences were found between student self‐graded scores (p = 0.08), but faculty scores did differ, with the OSCE having higher scores than PCS3 (p < 0.01). Many students with faculty‐graded scores greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean scored themselves higher than faculty did.ConclusionFeedback after PCS1 did not significantly improve scores. Students with low faculty‐graded scores frequently scored themselves higher indicating low self‐awareness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.