Impact of a clinician-to-clinician electronic consultation program in heart failure patients with previous hospitalization. Implications for heart failure multidisciplinary management

Abstract

Abstract Background A clinician-to-clinician electronic consultation (e-consultation) programme may not only improve the accessibility to care but may also impact patient outcomes, particularly in heart failure (HF) patients with a previous episode of hospitalization (HFH), group of patients associated with a worse outcome. Purpose To evaluate the impact of an outpatient care management programme that includes a clinician-to-clinician e-consultation on delay time in care, hospital admissions, and mortality in a high-risk group of patients with heart failure (HF) and previous episodes of HF hospitalization (HFH). Materials and methods We selected 6444 HF patients who visited the cardiology service at least once between 2010 and 2021. Of these, 4146 were attended in e-consultation, and 2230 had previous HFH (Fig 1a). Using an interrupted time series regression model, we analysed the impact of incorporating e-consultation into the healthcare model in the group of patients with HFH and evaluated the elapsed time to cardiology care, HF, cardiovascular (CV), and all-cause hospital admissions and mortality, calculating the incidence relative risk (iRR). We performed a multivariate logistic regression for each of these outcomes in both groups. Results Patients with HFH had a higher prevalence of men (P < 0.001) but had a similar age (P = 0.267) compared to patients without HFH. Patients with HFH had a higher prevalence of diabetes (P < 0.001), ischaemic heart disease (P = 0.036), and peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.008) (Fig 1b). In the group of patients with HFH, the introduction of e-consult substantially decreased waiting times to cardiology care (8.6 [8.7] vs. 55.4 [79.9] days, P < 0.001) (Fig 2a). In that group of patients, after e-consult implantation, hospital admissions for HF were reduced (iRR [95%CI]: 0.837 [0.840–0.833]), 0.900 [0.862–0.949] for CV and 0.699 [0.678–0.726] for all-cause hospitalizations (Fig 2b). There was also lower mortality (iRR [95%CI]: 0.715 [0.657–0.798] due to HF, 0.737 [0.764–0.706] for CV and 0.687 [0.652–0.718] for all-cause) (Fig 2c). The improved outcomes after e-consultation implementation were significantly higher in the group of patients with previous HFH. The multivariate analyses showed a higher risk of hospitalizations in men, patients with HFH, and those who required more emergency department assistance (Fig 2d). Conclusions In patients with HFH, an outpatient care programme that includes an e-consultation significantly reduced waiting times to cardiology care and was safe, with a lower rate of hospital admissions and mortality in the first year. Our results may have implications for optimize the heart failure care organization.Figure 1Figure 2