Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the impact of a capacity-building intervention (CBI) to support implementing provincial nutrition guidelines on food marketing in recreation facilities (RFs). DesignRandomized controlled trial within a natural experiment: food marketing in RFs from 3 guideline provinces randomly assigned to intervention (GL+CBI) or comparison (GL-ONLY) was compared with facilities in 1 province without guidelines (NO-GL). Food marketing was assessed by the Food and Beverage Marketing Assessment Tool for Settings. SettingCanadian provinces with/without voluntary nutrition guidelines for RFs. Participants51 RFs. Intervention18-month CBI. Main Outcome MeasuresChange in Food and Beverage Marketing Assessment Tool for Settings scores and marketing features between baseline and follow-up across groups. AnalysisKruskal–Wallis with post hoc Mann–Whitney U tests. ResultsNo significant differences in food marketing features between baseline and follow-up across groups except for a change in food marketing frequency (P = 0.045). The increase in frequency in NO-GL (median, 6.0; interquartile range, −2.0 to 8.5) was significantly greater than changes in the GL+CBI (P = 0.033) and GL-ONLY sites (P = 0.049). Conclusions and ImplicationsCapacity-building was not associated with improved food marketing features potentially because of nonmandated nutrition guidelines, low priority for change, and vague or narrow facility goals and guidelines. Nutrition guidelines with specific unhealthy food marketing restrictions should be mandated and supported.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call