Impact of a board certification system and adherence to the clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer on risk-adjusted surgical mortality after distal and total gastrectomy in Japan: a questionnaire survey of departments registered in the National Clinical Database.

Abstract

The relationship between board certification, clinical guideline implementation, and quality of gastric cancer surgery remains unclear. A web-based questionnaire survey was administered to departments registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan between October 2014 and January 2015. Quality indicators (QIs) based on the Donabedian model were evaluated. Structural QIs (e.g., affiliations with academic societies and board certifications) and process QIs (adherence to clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer) were assessed using risk-adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for surgical mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models with a generalized estimating equation were used. A total of 835 departments performing 40,992 distal gastrectomies and 806 departments performing 19,618 total gastrectomies responded. Some certified institutions and physicians showed significant associations, with lower AORs for surgical mortality. Important process QIs included pre- and postoperative abdominal CT scanning, endoscopic resection based on progression, curative resection with D2 dissection for advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopic surgery, and HER2 testing for patients with unresectable recurrent gastric cancer. Multiple structural and process QIs are associated with surgical mortality after gastrectomy in Japan. Measuring and visualizing QIs may enhance healthcare improvements.