Impact of 24-Hour In-House Intensivists on a Dedicated Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing models for cardiac surgery patients vary widely and correlate poorly with outcomes. Clinical outcomes associated with 24-hour, in-house intensivists working in a dedicated post-cardiac surgical unit has not been previously investigated. We sought to examine the safety and efficacy of such a model. A retrospective, propensity-matched, cohort study of all patients undergoing a cardiac surgical procedure at a single tertiary center was performed. The control cohort (n = 1,467) consisted of patients admitted to the traditional, mixed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) from January 2005 to January 2007. The intervention cohort (n = 1,089) consisted of patients admitted to a newly created "hybrid" cardiac surgery ICU (CICU) from January 2007 to January 2008, which was staffed by 24-hour in-house consultant intensivists and a daytime, fast track cardiac anesthesiologist. The primary outcomes were blood product utilization, requirement for ventilation, and ICU recidivism. The proportion of patients in the CICU cohort who received transfused red blood cells was decreased compared with the SICU cohort (30.2% versus 42.3%, p < 0.001). Similar reductions in platelets and fresh frozen plasma were also observed. The CICU patients were less likely to arrive to the ICU intubated (43.7% versus 66.5%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complications. Overall hospital length of stay was reduced in the CICU cohort by a median of 1 day (6 days [interquartile range, 5 to 8] versus 7 days [5 to 9], p < 0.001). Significant reductions in mortality and ICU recidivism were not observed. The current Manitoba CICU model of 24-hour intensive care physician/cardiac anesthesiologist staffing in postoperative cardiac surgery care is associated with reduced transfusion of blood components, decreased requirement for mechanical ventilation, and shorter hospital length of stay.