Impact modification of polypropylene

Abstract

AbstractThis paper compares the modification mechanism provided by ethylene‐octene (EO) copolymer to that of ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM) rubber. Within the limits of this study, the highest impact strength was achieved at 30–40% rubber content, regardless of the rubber type. An increase in rubber melt viscosity resulted in overall greater impact strength. At the optimum concentration, the high‐viscosity (MFI = 1 to 5) EO rubber provided modification mainly via a crazing mechanism, while the EPDM rubber functioned by energy dissipation through the three‐dimensional network structure formed with the polypropylene matrix. This paper also discusses the effects of the processing conditions on the physical properties of PP/EPR copolymer. An increase in processing temperature and screw speed resulted in a reduced number of discrete rubber particles and nearly no or very slight increase in impact strength, but a very significant reduction in tensile strength and tensile modulus.