Abstract

Following the global call for action by the World Health Organization to eliminate cervical cancer (CC), we evaluated how each CC policy decision in Norway influenced the timing of CC elimination, and whether introducing nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine would accelerate elimination timing and be cost-effective. We used a multi-modeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the CC incidence associated with six past and future CC prevention policy decisions compared with a pre-vaccination scenario involving 3-yearly cytology-based screening. Scenarios examined the introduction of routine HPV vaccination of 12-year-old girls with quadrivalent vaccine in 2009, a temporary catch-up program for females aged up to 26 years in 2016–2018 with bivalent vaccine, the universal switch to bivalent vaccine in 2017, expansion to include 12-year-old boys in 2018, the switch from cytology- to HPV-based screening for women aged 34–69 in 2020, and the potential switch to nonavalent vaccine in 2021. Introducing routine female vaccination in 2009 enabled elimination to be achieved by 2056 and prevented 17,300 cases. Cumulatively, subsequent policy decisions accelerated elimination to 2039. According to our modeling assumptions, switching to the nonavalent vaccine would not be considered ‘good value for money’ at relevant cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway unless the incremental cost was $19 per dose or less (range: $17–24) compared to the bivalent vaccine. CC control policies implemented over the last decade in Norway may have accelerated the timeframe to elimination by more than 17 years and prevented over 23,800 cases by 2110.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe recent global call for action by the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem (i.e., achieve incidence rates of

  • The recent global call for action by the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem requires country-specific evaluation of cervical cancer control programs (Brisson and Drolet, 2019; World Health Organization, 2018)

  • Scenario-1 examined the introduction of routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vacci­ nation of 12-year-old girls with the quadrivalent vaccine (4vHPV) in 2009; Scenario-2 reflected the addition of a temporary catch-up vacci­ nation program for women up to 26 years in 2016–2018 with bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV); Scenario-3 captured the routine vaccination program switch from the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV) to 2vHPV in 2017; Scenario-4 reflected the expansion of the routine vaccination program to include 12-year-old boys in 2018; Scenario-5 reflected the switch from 3-yearly cytology- to 5-yearly pri­ mary HPV-based screening for women aged 34–69 years assuming full implementation in 2020; and Scenario-6 reflected a future potential routine vaccination program switch from the 2vHPV to nonavalent HPV vaccine (9vHPV) in 2021

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recent global call for action by the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem (i.e., achieve incidence rates of

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call