Abstract

Immunoparesis is an adverse prognostic marker in plasma cell proliferative disorders. Its impact in AL amyloidosis has not been explored in depth. Newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients (n=998) were evaluated for immunoparesis by two methods. The first method was qualitative, considering the number of suppressed uninvolved immunoglobulins below the lower limit of normal (LLN) (none, partial, all). The second method was quantitative, assessing the average relative difference (ARD) of the uninvolved immunoglobulins from the LLN. Patients with suppression of all the uninvolved immunoglobulins were less likely to achieve very good partial response (VGPR) or better to first-line treatment (44%) compared with patients with partial suppression (68%) or preserved uninvolved immunoglobulins (64%; P<0.0001). In addition, patients with suppression of all the uninvolved immunoglobulins had a shorter survival compared with the respective comparators (median 18 vs 54 vs 52 months; P<0.0001). In the quantitative method, patients with a negative ARD were less likely to achieve VGPR or better (48%) and had a shorter survival (median 24 months) compared with patients with a positive ARD (69%, 57 months, respectively; P<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis for survival, both assessment methods retained an independent impact. Significant immunoparesis has a negative impact on response and survival in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.