Abstract

Simple SummaryTumor immune evasion is mediated in large part by the inhibition of anti-tumor T cell responses. Both the induction of tumor antigen-specific T cells and the activation state of T effector cells may be attenuated by surface receptors, which upon binding to counter receptors on immunoregulatory cell types and tumor cells, induce inhibitory T cell signaling. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are antibodies that block interaction of these receptor pairs and thereby prevent T cell inhibition. Only a small percentage of tumor patients are responsive to treatment with ICI, which on the one hand raises the issue of possible reasons for failure, and on the other hand has spurred the development of additional ICI targeting other T cell inhibitory receptors. Our review aims to summarize knowledge on the functional role of these (inhibitory) receptors by additional types of leukocytes, and consequences of receptor blockade by ICI as a potential cause for unwanted side effects limiting the success of therapy. Deeper knowledge in this regard is a prerequisite for the development of more refined combination therapies.The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that serve to enhance effector T-cell anti-tumor responses has strongly improved success rates in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and other tumor types. The currently approved ICI constitute monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 and anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1. By this, the T-cell-inhibitory CTLA-4/CD80/86 and PD-1/PD-1L/2L signaling axes are inhibited. This leads to sustained effector T-cell activity and circumvents the immune evasion of tumor cells, which frequently upregulate PD-L1 expression and modulate immune checkpoint molecule expression on leukocytes. As a result, profound clinical responses are observed in 40–60% of metastatic melanoma patients. Despite the pivotal role of T effector cells for triggering anti-tumor immunity, mounting evidence indicates that ICI efficacy may also be attributable to other cell types than T effector cells. In particular, emerging research has shown that ICI also impacts innate immune cells, such as myeloid cells, natural killer cells and innate lymphoid cells, which may amplify tumoricidal functions beyond triggering T effector cells, and thus improves clinical efficacy. Effects of ICI on non-T cells may additionally explain, in part, the character and extent of adverse effects associated with treatment. Deeper knowledge of these effects is required to further develop ICI treatment in terms of responsiveness of patients to treatment, to overcome resistance to ICI and to alleviate adverse effects. In this review we give an overview into the currently known immunomodulatory effects of ICI treatment in immune cell types other than the T cell compartment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call