Abstract

Groundwater is the major source of drinking water in many European countries, and in Denmark alone it accounts for more than 99% of the drinking water supply. Within the past decade pesticide residues have frequently been detected in groundwater, in many cases at levels exceeding the 0.1 µg/l limit set by the European Community. As a consequence, drinking water abstraction wells have had to be closed in many places in Denmark and other European countries, and a vast amount of money is expended to monitor groundwater pesticide levels. A degradation product of the herbicide dichlobenil, 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM), is the most common cause of drinking water well closure in Denmark. Triazines and their metabolites also contaminate groundwater in many countries, and pose a similar risk to the drinking water supply. Analysis of most pesticides and their degradation products is usually carried out by concentrating the samples by solvent extraction, and identifying the contaminants using gas chromatography (GC) or high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) combined with mass spectrometry (MS). These methods, although robust and well established, are very time-consuming and require specialised instrumentation. The large quantity of solvents used is another draw back to these methods, as the solvents themselves may be carcinogenic and are also well known contaminants of groundwater. The development of cheap, more sensitive and more rapid pesticide assays is therefore urgent. Due to their very high sensitivity, immunological methods have long been used in biological science for analysing a large variety of organic structures, but have only recently been introduced to environmental analysis. The benefit of such assays is primarily their high sensitivity, which allows the analysis to be undertaken without the need to concentrate the samples, but also the facility of dealing with large numbers of samples. Compared to conventional analyses, immunological methods face two major drawbacks – one related to specificity and the other to the fact that only very few chemicals can currently be analysed simultaneously. The crux of the specificity problem is that although antibodies react very specifically with particular chemical structures, these same structures may be present in analogous compounds. Thus antibodies developed to recognise, for example the herbicide atrazine might also recognise other triazines (Bruun et al. 2001). An important scientific challenge is therefore the development of highly specific assays recognising each individual compound, as well as assays recognising groups of related chemicals. With respect to the simultaneous analysis of numerous chemicals, this can be resolved by implementing the new biochip technology, which incorporates the parallellity of sample screening. On a pesticide biochip many specific immunological assays are carried out in isolated small spots on a glass or polymer surface. Each spot has a size of approximately 150 micrometers and forms a specific analysis. Such a miniaturised platform will be usable for monitoring programmes where water samples have to be screened for a range of chemical contaminants. The overall objectives of this study have been (1) to develop immunoassays for high-sensitivity analysis of specific pesticides and chemically related groups of pesticides, and (2) to transfer the developed assays to a miniaturised biochip platform in a manner allowing analysis of several pesticides simultaneously.

Highlights

  • Immunological analysis of pesticidesThe basis for the development of new immunological analyses is the antibody that reacts with complementary molecules, the so-called antigens

  • Groundwater is the major source of drinking water in many European countries, and in Denmark alone it accounts for more than 99% of the drinking water supply

  • To initiate antibody production the pesticide-carrier complex is injected into an animal, e.g. a rabbit or a mouse, inducing an immunological response resulting in the production of antibodies against the pesticide-carrier complex

Read more

Summary

Immunological analysis of pesticides

The basis for the development of new immunological analyses is the antibody that reacts with complementary molecules, the so-called antigens. The organism produces antibodies that recognise and bind to specific molecular structures on the surface of the penetrating bacteria or virus (the antigens). The chemical structures of the pesticides themselves are too small to induce an immunological response. To initiate antibody production the pesticide-carrier complex is injected into an animal, e.g. a rabbit or a mouse, inducing an immunological response resulting in the production of antibodies against the pesticide-carrier complex. Antibodies are produced by so-called B-cells each producing a single antibody species, which recognise a specific structure on the pesticide. As the animal contains many B-cells which all produce antibodies, a range of antibodies reacting with different structures on the pesticide and with different affinity will be generated. It is often more appropriate to produce monoclonal antibodies (Mab), i.e. specific antibodies all arising from the same B-cell clone

Production of monoclonal antibodies
Development of immunological assays
From microtitre plate to pesticide biochip
Findings
Possibilities and limitations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.