Abstract

In ARTEMIS, 58% of AR101-treated subjects vs. 2% of placebo-treated subjects tolerated 1000 mg peanut protein as a single dose at exit double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC; P < 0.0001) following treatment with AR101, an investigational oral biologic drug product for peanut oral immunotherapy. Immune responses to AR101 were assessed at 3 timepoints and compared with the placebo treatment group. All enrolled subjects had a clinical history of peanut allergy, demonstrated sensitization to peanut (skin prick test [SPT] mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm and/or peanut-specific immunoglobulin E [psIgE] ≥ 0.35 kUA/L), and reacted to ≤ 300 mg peanut protein at screening DBPCFC. SPT wheal diameter (mm), psIgE (kUA/L) and psIgG4 (mgA/L) assessments were performed at screening, end of dose escalation and study completion (following 3 months at 300 mg/day). Differences between treatment groups from screening to exit were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms fitted for group, country and screening value. A total of 175 ARTEMIS subjects (AR101 n = 132, placebo n = 43) were treated. SPT wheal diameter, psIgE levels, psIgG4 levels and psIgE/IgG4 ratio are summarized in Table 1 . From baseline to exit (AR101 vs. placebo), psIgG4 levels increased ( P < 0.0001); SPT wheal diameter ( P < 0.0001) and psIgE/psIgG4 ( P < 0.0001) decreased. In AR101-treated subjects, psIgE levels 2 increased at the end of dose escalation and decreased back to baseline levels, with no change between treatment groups ( P = 0.6089) from baseline to exit. Exposure to AR101 was associated with immunologic changes consistent with immunomodulation: increased psIgG4, decreased peanut SPT wheal size and transient changes in psIgE levels, as reported in previous peanut oral immunotherapy trials.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call