Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have significantly improved treatment outcome of rheumatic diseases since their incorporation into treatment protocols two decades ago. Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of patients experiences either primary or secondary failure to TNFi due to ineffectiveness of the drug or adverse reactions. Secondary failure and adverse events can be related to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The earliest studies that reported ADA toward TNFi mainly used drug-sensitive assays. Retrospectively, we recognize this has led to an underestimation of the amount of ADA produced due to drug interference. Drug-tolerant ADA assays also detect ADA in the presence of drug, which has contributed to the currently reported higher incidence of ADA development. Comprehension and awareness of the assay format used for ADA detection is thus essential to interpret ADA measurements correctly. In addition, a concurrent drug level measurement is informative as it may provide insight in the extent of underestimation of ADA levels and improves understanding the clinical consequences of ADA formation. The clinical effects are dependent on the ratio between the amount of drug that is neutralized by ADA and the amount of unbound drug. Pharmacokinetic modeling might be useful in this context. The ADA response generally gives rise to high affinity IgG antibodies, but this response will differ between patients. Some patients will not reach the phase of affinity maturation while others generate an enduring high titer high affinity IgG response. This response can be transient in some patients, indicating a mechanism of tolerance induction or B-cell anergy. In this review several different aspects of the ADA response toward TNFi will be discussed. It will highlight the ADA assays, characteristics and regulation of the ADA response, impact of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics of TNFi, clinical implications of ADA formation, and possible mitigation strategies.

Highlights

  • A BRIEF HISTORY OF TNF INHIBITOR DEVELOPMENTDuring the last decades, recombinant therapeutic proteins have revolutionized the treatment of a wide variety of diseases

  • This is demonstrated for RA patients treated with adalimumab, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab and for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with natalizumab [25]

  • The majority of studies focusing on immunogenicity used drug-sensitive assays which, in general, underestimate the amount of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) present in the serum due to drug interference

Read more

Summary

ASSAYS USED FOR ADA DETECTION

Assessing the immunogenicity of TNFi is complex, amongst others due to potential interference of the drug with the assay, variable time course of the ADA response, and variability of the antibody characteristics such as affinities and isotypes. Since detection of ADA in all assay formats is based on a labeled variant of the drug, this complex formation will shield binding of the detection reagent This phenomenon is called drug interference and it will result in underestimation of the immunogenic potential of the TNFi. Early studies that focused on the immunogenicity of TNFi used assays with very low drug-tolerance (drug-sensitive assay), thereby underestimating the levels of immunogenicity. To maintain tolerance to self, negative feedback loops are in place that prevent the generation of high affinity antibodies that recognize self-epitopes Consistent with this concept, ADA formation to therapeutic antibodies such as the TNFi appears to be almost exclusively restricted to epitopes that are drug-specific, i.e., the idiotype. The TNF-receptor/Fc-tail fusion protein etanercept is unique in the sense that does not have an idiotype and only the fusion region between the domains contains non-endogenous epitopes that are potentially immunogenic, which may explain its overall low immunogenicity [35]

Drug Neutralization by ADA
Covariates Influencing Immunogenicity
Induction of Immune Tolerance
General PK of TNFi
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling
Impaired Response
Adverse Events
Concomitant Use of Immune Modulating Drugs
Dose and Dosing Regimen
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call