Abstract
The immunogenicity and protectivity of two different toxoid vaccines were compared in mice. In one formulation, toxoids (diphtheria or tetanus) were adsorbed to alumoxid, whereas in the other formulation the toxoids were crosslinked to immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virosomes (IRIVs). A preimmunization with influenza antigens is necessary for a good anti-toxoid antibody response when the IRIV formulation was administered. After two immunizations with the IRIV- or alum-based vaccines, the IRIV-based formulation induced a higher humoral immune response than toxoids adsorbed to alum. Using an in vitro test, diphtheria toxin neutralizing antibodies were tested. Di-IRIV induced a significantly ( p=0.002) higher titer of diphtheria toxin neutralizing antibodies than Di-alum. Tetanus challenge experiments showed, that the IRIV-based tetanus vaccine induced a threefold higher titer of protective antibodies than the tetanus toxoid adsorbed to alum. Therefore, the IRIV-based formulations appeared to be superior to the alum-based vaccines in terms of immunogenicity and protectivity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
