Abstract

Inactivated and fowlpox virus (FP)-vectored vaccines have been used to control H5 avian influenza (AI) in poultry. In H5 AI endemic countries, breeder flocks are vaccinated and therefore, maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) are transferred to their progeny. Results of three immunogenicity and one efficacy studies performed in birds with or without MDA indicated that the immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine based on a H5N9 AI isolate (inH5N9) was severely impaired in chicks hatched from inH5N9-vaccinated breeders. This MDA interference was lower when breeders received only one administration of the same vaccine and could be overcome by priming the chicks at day-of-age with a live recombinant FP-vectored vaccine with H5 avian influenza gene insert (FP-AI). The interference of anti-FP MDA was of lower intensity than the interference of anti-AI MDA. The highest interference observed on the prime-boost immunogenicity was in chicks hatched from breeders vaccinated with the same prime-boost scheme. The level of protection against an antigenic variant H5N1 highly pathogenic AI isolate from Indonesia against which the FP-AI or inH5N9 alone was poorly protective could be circumvented by the prime-boost regimen in birds with either FP or AI MDA. Thus, the immunogenicity of vaccines in young chicks with MDA depends on the vaccination scheme and the type of vaccine used in their parent flocks. The heterologous prime-boost in birds with MDA may at least partially overcome MDA interference on inactivated vaccine.

Highlights

  • Vaccines are useful tools to control avian influenza (AI) especially when biosecurity and stamping out strategies alone are not successfully implemented [1,2,3]

  • Viral shedding was detected in all Fowlpox-recombinant containing the H5 of A/turkey/Ireland/83 (vFP89)-vaccinated challenged birds at similar levels as non-vaccinated control (7.1 and 7.7 log10 at 2 and 4 dpc, respectively) in birds with H5N9 maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) and at slightly lower levels (6.3 and 6.6 log10 at 2 and 4 dpc, respectively) in Specific pathogen free (SPF) birds. These results indicated a low level of protection induced by vFP89 alone against this variant Indonesian highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) H5N1 isolate which may further be decreased by the presence of AI MDA

  • Most published studies on the efficacy of avian influenza vaccines in chickens are performed in SPF chickens without MDA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vaccines are useful tools to control avian influenza (AI) especially when biosecurity and stamping out strategies alone are not successfully implemented [1,2,3]. 1378/1983 H5N8 highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) isolate has been used in broilers since 1998 in low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H5N2 endemic areas of Central America. The FP-AI efficacy in presence of FP and/or H5 AI virus MDA has been shown in a highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) as well as low pathogenic AI (LPAI) Mexican H5N2 challenge model [7,13]. This FP-vectored vaccine was shown to be efficacious against different HPAI H5N1 isolates in SPF chicks [14,15]. The objective of the studies presented here was to further analyse the effect of MDA on FP-AI vaccine immunogenicity and to evaluate the efficacy of a primeboost regimen (priming with FP-AI and boosting with inactivated vaccine) in birds with FP or AI MDA

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call