Abstract

Among the parasites of insects, endoparasitoids impose a costly challenge to host defenses because they use their host’s body for the development and maturation of their eggs or larvae, and ultimately kill the host. Tachinid flies are highly specialized acoustically orienting parasitoids, with first instar mobile larvae that burrow into the host’s body to feed. We investigated the possibility that Teleogryllus oceanicus field crickets employ postinfestation strategies to maximize survival when infested with the larvae of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. Using crickets from the Hawaiian Islands of Kauai, where the parasitoid is present, and crickets from the Cook Islands (Mangaia), where the parasitoid is absent, we evaluated fitness consequences of infestation by comparing feeding behavior, reproductive capacity, and survival of males experimentally infested with O. ochracea larvae. We also evaluated mechanisms underlying host responses by comparing gene expression in crickets infested with fly larvae for different lengths of time with that of uninfested control crickets. We observed weak population differences in fitness (spermatophore production) and survival (total survival time postinfestation). These responses generally did not show an interaction between population and the number of larva hosts carried or by host body condition. Gene expression patterns also revealed population differences in response to infestation, but we did not find evidence for consistent differences in genes associated with immunity or stress response. One possibility is that any postinfestation evolved resistance does not involve genes associated with these particular functional categories. More likely, these results suggest that coevolution with the fly does not strongly select for either postinfestation resistance or tolerance of parasitoid larvae in male crickets.

Highlights

  • Different types of host–parasite relationships are characterized by highly variable costs to the survival and reproduction of both partners in the interaction

  • We evaluated molecular mechanisms underlying host responses by comparing gene expression in crickets infested with fly larvae for different lengths of time against that of uninfested control crickets

  • Given the high likelihood of host death following successful invasion by O. ochracea larva(e), we hypothesized that hosts evolving in an environment where they are susceptible to such infestation are under selection to have increased tolerance but not necessarily increased immunological resistance to such parasitoids

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Different types of host–parasite relationships are characterized by highly variable costs to the survival and reproduction of both partners in the interaction. When endoparasitoids are introduced as eggs, hosts can resist further development and maturation into larval stages by early detection followed by encapsulation of eggs, which causes parasitoid asphyxiation and triggers production of cytotoxic substances (Kraaijeveld & Godfray, 1999, 2009; Lavine & Strand, 2002) Some parasitoids, such as tachinid flies, release mobile first instar larvae, or planidia, on and around potential hosts (Adamo et al, 1995; Cade, 1975). We ask whether postinfestation strategies might be employed by T. oceanicus crickets to maximize survival when infested with O. ochracea Such strategies could involve resistance or tolerance or both, we hypothesize that tolerance would be more effective at increasing survival and reproduction due to the highly mobile nature of the parasitoid larvae once in the host. We do not make predictions regarding differential expression of any specific functional group of genes in relation to tolerance, focusing instead on overall dissimilarity of transcriptional responses and coexpressed gene modules between populations

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.