Abstract

Simple SummaryFor pathologists, how to precisely diagnose cancer from microscopy slides of tumor tissue samples so that each patient may receive the optimal treatment for his specific type of disease is a major task. Recent research based on digital pathology image analysis enables new approaches to assess tumor-host interaction at a microscopic level. The current study applies a novel spatial analysis method which computes Immunogradient indicators to estimate the migration of immune cells towards the tumor across the tumor/stroma interface. These indicators, computed for two types of immune cells (CD8 and CD20), proved to be independent prognostic factors in this study of 87 patients with colorectal cancer. The indicators were combined with infiltrative tumor growth pattern, assessed by a pathologist, into a new immuno-interface score which enabled prediction of the patient survival independent of other clinical, pathology and molecular characteristics of the tumor. The study demonstrates the value of computational pathology to advance the precision of clinical decision-making.Tumor-associated immune cells have been shown to predict patient outcome in colorectal (CRC) and other cancers. Spatial digital image analysis-based cell quantification increases the informative power delivered by tumor microenvironment features and leads to new prognostic scoring systems. In this study we evaluated the intratumoral density of immunohistochemically stained CD8, CD20 and CD68 cells in 87 cases of CRC (48 were microsatellite stable, MSS, and 39 had microsatellite instability, MSI) in both the intratumoral tumor tissue and within the tumor-stroma interface zone (IZ) which was extracted by a previously developed unbiased hexagonal grid analytics method. Indicators of immune-cell gradients across the extracted IZ were computed and explored along with absolute cell densities, clinicopathological and molecular data, including gene mutation (BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA) and MSI status. Multiple regression modeling identified (p < 0.0001) three independent prognostic factors: CD8+ and CD20+ Immunogradient indicators, that reflect cell migration towards the tumor, were associated with improved patient survival, while the infiltrative tumor growth pattern was linked to worse patient outcome. These features were combined into CD8-CD20 Immunogradient and immuno-interface scores which outperformed both tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging and molecular characteristics, and importantly, revealed high prognostic value both in MSS and MSI CRCs.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most commonly diagnosed and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both sexes [1]

  • In this study we investigated the prognostic value of immune cell density and Immunogradient indicators for CD8+, CD20+ and CD68+ in the context of microsatellite instability (MSI) status and a variety of clinicopathological and molecular features in a selected CRC patient cohort

  • The study was performed in an 87 CRC patient cohort with formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) surgical resection specimens tested for microsatellite and gene mutation status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most commonly diagnosed and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both sexes [1]. The main factor in cancer management is still the traditional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM). The precision in identifying the patients at high risk of tumor progression and those who may benefit from combined therapies could be improved by including the information on the molecular profiles of tumors and “immune” community in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to the TNM system [4,5,6]. Only a few molecular markers have been implemented for the management of CRC these have mainly been for therapy stratification such as testing for activating KRAS, NRAS and BRAF gene mutations as exclusion criteria for the use of EGFR-targeted therapies in metastatic CRC (mCRC) [2]. RAS and BRAF mutations are considered to be poor prognostic factors [7], outside of targeted therapies, they are not used for outcome predictions in routine

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call