Abstract
7011 Background: AML LSC are believed to be responsible for residual and resistant leukemic disease leading to relapse. Understanding differences between bulk AML and the LSC subpopulation may allow the identification of novel LSC targets, especially for the most adverse risk AML where few patients are cured. Targeting LSC may be needed to eradicate AML, and immune-based therapies provide an approach for eliminating LSC. The transcriptional landscape of immune-related genes in LSC is not well understood. Methods: Samples were collected at diagnosis from 12 patients with high-risk AML prior to therapy. Bulk (CD45-dim blasts) and LSC (Lin-CD34+CD38-CD123+) AML marrow cells were FACS-sorted and analyzed using whole genome RNA-sequencing. Transcriptomes were analyzed using AltAnalyze software to identify differentially expressed genes in bulk AML cells and in AML LSC populations. These genes were further assessed by gene enrichment analysis using data from Gene Ontology (GO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas Project (CGAP). Results: Sixty-eight genes were identified with greater than 3-fold differential expression between bulk AML and LSC. GO enrichment analysis demonstrated more than 10-fold enrichment of genes involved in the molecular functions, biologic processes, and cell components related to the antigen presentation pathway, with the comparative down-regulation occurring in LSC. Among the top differentially expressed gene clusters, both the MHC class II and interferon-gamma signaling/response pathway gene expression was blunted in LSC. Additional expression analysis revealed that 42% of a CGAP-curated list of 201 antigen-processing and -presentation genes had significantly decreased expression in the LSC subpopulation compared to bulk AML. Conclusions: LSC from primary AML patient samples are characterized by reduction in expression of MHC class II receptor and antigen presentation genes compared to bulk AML. These results suggest that impairment in the presentation and/or processing of tumor associated antigens by MHC class II on LSC, along with tonic sponging of immune response cells and diversion away from LSC by bulk AML, may contribute to LSC evasion of immune surveillance and response.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
