Abstract

Purpose of ReviewImmune checkpoint inhibitors have shown very promising outcomes in the subset of metastatic colorectal cancers (CRCs) that are mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). We reviewed the existing literature on immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancers to highlight the recent advances and future directions.Recent FindingsThe significance of immune check point inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic CRCs has been validated by several studies employing anti-programmed death cell receptor (anti-PD1) and anti-PDL1 antibodies single agent or in combination with anti-CTLA4 antibodies (“KEYNOTE” and “CHECKMATE” studies). This has led to FDA approval of these drugs. At present, its approval is limited to those who have failed traditional chemotherapy (5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan). The trials for the dMMR/MSI-H CRCs are now being moved up in terms of first-line, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant settings.SummaryThe results of various studies favor the excellent antitumor activity and safety profile of anti PD-1 monoclonal antibodies that include pembrolizumab and nivolumab in MSI-H colorectal cancer. Combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has also shown significant clinical benefit in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic CRC patients. These have now been FDA-approved. Multiple ongoing studies assessing the safety and efficacy of other anti-PD/PD-L1 agents (e.g., durvalumab, atezolizumab) alone or in combination therapy with classes of drugs are in progress. The goal ideally would be to identify approaches to expand activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond the dMMR/MSI-H subset of CRC, which represent 4–5% of metastatic CRC patients. These are also being moved up in terms of usage in earlier lines of therapy and neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading type of cancer in the USA in both males and females [1]

  • The progress has been due to multiple drugs, chemotherapies, biologics, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, alone or in combination that have led to the improvement in overall survival (OS) with metastatic CRCs

  • We aim to review the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced metastatic CRC patients, recent advances, and future directions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading type of cancer in the USA in both males and females [1]. The immune checkpoint inhibitors at present are approved for the metastatic dMMR/MSI-H subset of CRC patients [6]. While any of the three commonly used testing strategies, i.e., dMMR through IHC or MSIH through PCR or TMB through NGS-based assays identify this subset of CRC patients, it is not a perfect overlap. There are small subsets who are microsatellite stable (MSS) and mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) who may still be hypermutated and be TMB-High (e.g., patients with POLE mutations). This is an area of ongoing research with trials seeking patients who have these tumor characteristics. Following is an account of the data far on the use of anti-PD1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 agents

Pembrolizumab Monotherapy
Nivolumab Monotherapy
Antitumor activity of pembrolizumab
Immune Check Point Inhibitors and MSS Colorectal Cancer
Radiotherapy With Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancers
Trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors only
Trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy
Trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors plus biologic drugs
Trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiation therapy
Disease control rate
Findings
Compliance With Ethical Standards

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.