Abstract

The world appears to be moving into a new era of international migration during which gaps between policies needed to manage migratory flows and those enacted in practice will widen. Whereas immigrants in the late 20th century were motivated by a desire to improve their wellbeing by accessing opportunities in richer countries, in the early 21st century they are increasingly motivated by a desire to escape threats at places of origin, yielding very different patterns of migration and selectivity. Using the United States as an example, this paper reviews how mismatches between the underlying realities of international migration and the policies adopted to manage them, in both eras have produced and continue to produce dysfunctional outcomes. Although deleterious policy outcomes might be avoided in the future by combining a well-grounded conceptual understanding of the forces producing immigration with a clear statement of the goals to be achieved through specific policy interventions, the avoidance of further dysfunctional outcomes is unlikely to be achieved in an age of rising populism, disinformation, and xenophobia.

Highlights

  • The world appears to be moving into a new era of international migration during which gaps between policies needed to manage migratory flows and those enacted in practice will widen

  • Despite the prominence of international migration throughout the world, its causes and consequences are poorly understood by policy makers and the public

  • It is important to judge the ability of unknown others to act on their motivations, assessing the degree to which they are capable of getting things done. These two dimensions of social perception are labeled warmth and competence and together they define a space in human social cognition described by the stereotype content model (Cuddy et al 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world appears to be moving into a new era of international migration during which gaps between policies needed to manage migratory flows and those enacted in practice will widen. These policies were not grounded in any real understanding of the causes or consequences of Mexican immigration, and rather than achieving their intended goal of curtailing unauthorized migration, they backfired and accelerated the rate of undocumented population growth (see Massey et al 2016).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call