Abstract

After World War II, migration, particularly in the post-Cold War became a global challenge. Today, there are 191 million migrants around the world that constitutes 3 percent of the world's total population. And it is a fact that has various social, economic, humanitarian, political and especially juridical dimensions and effects at the international level as an international issue. National Immigration Law is a part of the legal system governing the strangers in the host state whose provisions are determined by the domestic legal system of the recent state. Although the standards of international law are intended to govern migration, but in this case, however, the regulation of the source government is ineffective. Unless there are specific treaty arrangements while global recruits in the field of migration are specifically impossible and regional multilateral treaties can only be cited. This article tries to review and analyze the immigrant rights in Iran as a source country and Canada as a host country with their own different rights regarding the immigrants by a descriptive - analytical approach. Because of tangible vacuum in the literature of international law and the need to explore other sources of international law, according to the first paragraph of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, on the one hand and the necessity of this article in Iran as a transit country for migration and particularly to Canada on the other hand, conducting this research is of great importance.

Highlights

  • This paper focuses on "immigrant rights in Iran and Canada and international law"

  • The International Migration law put the general principles of this legal trend at the disposal of the internal domestic systems, but these legal systems have gains that are considered as common legal principles of public international law sources

  • This article will attempt to answer the following question as: What is the difference between the rights of refugees in Iran and Canada? Scientifically and comprehensively and since international conventions do not exist in this regard; because of tangible vacuum in the literature of international law and the need to explore other sources of international law, according to the first paragraph of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, on the one hand and the necessity of this article in Iran as a transit country for migration and to Canada on the other hand, conducting this research is of great importance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper focuses on "immigrant rights in Iran and Canada and international law". the International Migration law put the general principles of this legal trend at the disposal of the internal domestic systems, but these legal systems have gains that are considered as common legal principles of public international law sources. The purpose of this paper is to identify immigrants' rights under domestic legal procedures which are recognizable as joint actions among countries in the form of the general principles of international law divides Immigration procedures into two general categories, concession granted methods and acquired granted ones; and the second method is attainable through extreme methods in addition to the legal way but the former is the privilege that only applies to legal immigrants This descriptive and analytical paper examines immigration as the dependent variable and laws Iran and Canada as the independent variable and information contained has been extracted from library, Internet and offical documents. IOM has managed public activities of immigrants and official policies of the countries to come closer to each other This causes the creativity of immigrants to be more effective and more sustainable and provide better control of potential benefits of labor migration for countries of origin and destination as well as for migrants and their families. There are centers in these countries that trains qualified people, provide immigration law license or migration advice. (Ghaffari Namin, 2011: 36-37)

Means to obtain citizenship
Marriage
Divorce
Property
Inheritance
Findings
Conclusion and Recommendations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call