Abstract

Despite the emphasis placed on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence from representative studies of older adults including pre-COVID-19 data and repeated assessments during the pandemic is scarce. To examine changes in mental health and well-being before and during the initial and later phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and test whether patterns varied with sociodemographic characteristics in a representative sample of older adults living in England. This longitudinal cohort study analyzed data from 5146 older adults participating in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing who provided data before the COVID-19 pandemic (2018 and 2019) and at 2 occasions in 2020 (June or July as well as November or December). The COVID-19 pandemic and sociodemographic characteristics, including sex, age, partnership status, and socioeconomic position. Changes in depression (8-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale), anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale), quality of life (12-item Control, Autonomy, Self-realization, and Pleasure scale), and loneliness (3-item Revised University of California, Los Angeles, loneliness scale) were tested before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using fixed-effects regression models. Of 5146 included participants, 2723 (52.9%) were women, 4773 (92.8%) were White, and the mean (SD) age was 67.7 (10.6) years. The prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms increased from 12.5% (95% CI, 11.5-13.4) before the COVID-19 pandemic to 22.6% (95% CI, 21.6-23.6) in June and July 2020, with a further rise to 28.5% (95% CI, 27.6-29.5) in November and December 2020. This was accompanied by increased loneliness and deterioration in quality of life. The prevalence of anxiety rose from 9.4% (95% CI, 8.8-9.9) to 10.9% (95% CI, 10.3-11.5) from June and July 2020 to November and December 2020. Women and nonpartnered people experienced worse changes in mental health. Participants with less wealth had the lowest levels of mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher socioeconomic groups had better mental health overall but responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with more negative changes. In this longitudinal cohort study of older adults living in England, mental health and well-being continued to worsen as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, and socioeconomic inequalities persisted. Women and nonpartnered people experienced greater deterioration in mental health.

Highlights

  • Higher socioeconomic groups had better mental health overall but responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with more negative changes. In this longitudinal cohort study of older adults living in England, mental health and well-being continued to worsen as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, and socioeconomic inequalities persisted

  • Using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) COVID-19 substudy carried out in June and July 2020 and in November and December 2020, we evaluated whether mental health and well-being were affected at 2 time points during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years

  • Studies involving repeated assessments have suggested that the highest levels of distress were experienced early in the COVID-19 pandemic, with recovery during the summer months of 2020.22,28 We showed that the mental health and well-being of older adults continued to worsen in the second lockdown period

Read more

Summary

Methods

Sample The data came from ELSA, an ongoing representative study of older adults 50 years and older living in England[23,24] interviewed every 2 years since 2002 (9 waves of data have been collected). The ELSA COVID-19 substudy collected data in June and July 2020 and in November and December 2020.25 The response rate was high in both waves (cross-sectional, 75%; longitudinal, 94%). For the purpose of the present study, we created a longitudinal sample including 5146 respondents of the ELSA COVID-19 substudy (52 years and older in 2020) who participated in both COVID-19 survey periods and in the most recent regular ELSA wave previous to COVID-19 (wave 9 in 2018 and 2019). Ethical approval for the regular ELSA study was obtained from the National Research Ethics Service. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.