Abstract

Abstract. In this paper we investigate the relationship between polar cap sporadic-E layers and the direction of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) using a 2-year database from Longyearbyen (75.2 CGM Lat, Svalbard) and Thule (85.4 CGM Lat, Greenland). It is found that the MLT distributions of sporadic-E occurrence are different at the two stations, but both are related to the IMF orientation. This relationship, however, changes from the centre of the polar cap to its border. Layers are more frequent during positive By at both stations. This effect is particularly strong in the central polar cap at Thule, where a weak effect associated with Bz is also observed, with positive Bz correlating with a higher occurrence of Es. Close to the polar cap boundary, at Longyearbyen, the By effect is weaker than at Thule. On the other hand, Bz plays there an equally important role as By, with negative Bz correlating with the Es occurrence. Since Es layers can be created by electric fields at high latitudes, a possible explanation for the observations is that the layers are produced by the polar cap electric field controlled by the IMF. Using electric field estimates calculated by means of the statistical APL convection model from IMF observations, we find that the diurnal distributions of sporadic-E occurrence can generally be explained in terms of the electric field mechanism. However, other factors must be considered to explain why more layers occur during positive than during negative By and why the Bz dependence of layer occurrence in the central polar cap is different from that at the polar cap boundary.

Highlights

  • Sporadic-E (Es) layers are formed by vertical accumulation of ionospheric plasma into thin sheets with high electron density and mainly metallic composition

  • At high latitudes both the neutral wind and the electric field may contribute to the formation of sporadic E (e.g. Kirkwood and Nilsson, 2000; Matthews 1998), the electric field often dominates over the neutral wind due to the large values of the electric field (Nygren, 1990; Parkinson et al, 1998; Bedey and Watkins, 2001)

  • This paper describes the statistical results of the relationship between the observed interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientation and sporadic E occurrence and discusses some possible explanations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sporadic-E (Es) layers are formed by vertical accumulation of ionospheric plasma into thin sheets with high electron density and mainly metallic composition (see, e.g. Whitehead, and references therein; Behnke and Vickrey, 1975). The formation of Es is nowadays generally attributed to the wind shear mechanism (Axford, 1961, 1963; Whitehead, 1961) and/or to directional effect of the electric field (Nygren et al, 1984; Bristow and Watkins, 1993; Kirkwood and von Zahn, 1991). Bristow and Watkins (1994) studied theoretically the effect of different convection patterns on the geographic distribution of Es by applying the Heppner and Maynard (1987) convection model. The IMF-based statistical model of the convection electric field by Weimer (1995) was used by Bedey and Watkins (1996; 1998) to explain the observed seasonal and diurnal variations of the Es layers over Sondrestrom. Both Wan et al (1999) and MacDougall et al (2000a) observed a strong correlation of IMF By and a weaker correlation of Bz with

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call