Abstract

“Fracture network stimulation and oil-water infiltration and replacement” are recent attempts to effectively produce oil from tight reservoirs. On the one hand, the formation can be fractured by the fracturing fluid, which can carry proppant into fractures. On the other hand, the fracturing fluid can spontaneously infiltrate into the pores under the action of capillary pressure to displace the oil phase, thereby enhancing the oil recovery. To distinguish imbibition and displacement processes during fluid replacement in tight reservoirs is difficult, and the effect of these two processes is also vaguely defined. In this study, an experimental method that can visualize the imbibition and displacement process is proposed by combining the core slice displacement experiment. Based on this method, the process of imbibition and displacement can be effectively distinguished, and imbibition retention rate can be quantitatively characterized. The effectiveness of this method is proved by taking the core of Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoir in the Ordos Basin as the research object. The results show that the force direction of the fluid under imbibition is related to the wettability, and it is always from the wetting phase to the nonwetting phase, while the force direction of fluid under displacement is mainly related to the directivity of displacement pressure difference. Based on the difference of force action, imbibition and displacement can be quantitatively characterized, respectively. During the imbibition process, the peak value of the NMR curve corresponding to the small pore throat shifts to the left, and the signal amplitude increases. During the displacement process, the peak value of the NMR curve corresponding to the small pore throat has no obvious shift, nor signal amplitude change, but the peak value of the curve corresponding to the large pore throat shifts to the right. The results also indicate that there is an exponential negative correlation between imbibition retention rate and gas permeability. The greater the gas permeability is, the smaller the imbibition retention rate is.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call