Abstract

Although there is accumulating evidence for the usefulness of imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), there are few studies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and the impact of the frequency of use has not been well addressed. From the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study; a Japanese registry comprising 17 institutions, consecutive patients undergoing successful PCI from April 2008 through March 2014 were enrolled. Subjects were divided into two groups: imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI. Clinical outcome was a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis within 1 year. A total of 6025 ACS patients were enrolled: 3613 and 2412 patients with imaging- and angiography-guided PCI, respectively. Adverse cardiac events were significantly lower in the imaging-guided PCI group (long-rank P < 0.001). Even after propensity-score matching, the event rates still showed significant differences between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.004). To assess the effects of frequency of imaging usage, we divided the 17 institutions into six low-, six moderate-, and five high-frequency groups. The event rates decreased depending on the frequency, seemingly driven by stepwise event suppression in angiography-guided PCI. In Japanese ACS patients, the incidence of adverse clinical events in patients treated with imaging-guided PCI were significantly lower than that in patients with angiography-guided PCI. Better clinical result was found in the institutions using intravascular imaging more frequently. University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN)-CTR (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/). Identifier: KICS (UMIN000015397).

Highlights

  • Intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a useful tool for providing information on coronary lesion characteristics and the landing site of coronary stents

  • A total of 6025 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study: 2412 patients underwent PCI with angiography-guided PCI and 3613 patients with imaging-guided PCI (Fig. 1)

  • A Kaplan-Meyer analysis revealed that patients undergoing imaging-guided PCI had a significantly lower rate of cardiac events than angiography-guided PCI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a useful tool for providing information on coronary lesion characteristics and the landing site of coronary stents. Extended author information available on the last page of the article on postimplantation stent expansion and apposition or possible complications during PCI [1,2,3,4]. There is accumulating evidence for the usefulness of imaging-guided PCI [5,6,7,8,9], there are few studies evaluating the impact of these modalities during PCI procedures in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [10, 11]. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of intravascular imaging during primary PCI for improving clinical outcome in Japanese patients with ACS in a large-scale, multicenter, observational study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call