Abstract

3048 Background: Preclinical studies suggest that mTOR inhibitors may have both metabolic and anti-angiogenic effects. We employed FDG-PET as a pharmacodynamic marker of mTOR inhibition, and DCE-MRI as an indicator of changes in tumor blood flow in a phase 1 combination study of RAD001 and cetuximab. Methods: 29 patients with EGFR-expressing solid tumors were randomized to a 3-week run-in of single agent RAD001 (30-70 mg PO) or cetuximab (400 mg/m2 IV loading, 250 mg/m2 IV maintenance) weekly, followed by the combination weekly. The primary endpoints were phase II dose finding and toxicity characterization. FDG-PET and DCE-MRI were performed at three time points (baseline, run-in, and combination), to assess for changes in tumor metabolic activity and perfusion, and for subsequent correlation to treatment response (CT or MRI after every two cycles of combination therapy). Results: RAD 001 was tolerated at the highest dose level. Grade 3 or worse toxicity included thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, elevation in AST and alkaline phosphatase, and skin toxicity. 10 patients were evaluable for response. 5 patients had stable disease lasting 4-19 months (colon, parotid, anal and 2 ovarian). Mean % change in SUVmax from baseline for those treated with RAD001 during run-in (n=12) was -23.4 (range +1.4 to -52.9%), and a dose relationship was evident. The SUV change in pts treated first with cetuximab (n=13) was -9.6% (-53 to +35%). In 10 pts in whom RAD001 was added after cetuximab, there was an additional 11% decrease in SUV, while in patients treated first with RAD001, the SUV change was +12.4%, suggesting that an initial inhibitory effect was being circumvented by the tumor. Mean % change in SUVmax from baseline for the group with SD was lower than in the group with PD. The Ktrans measured by DCE-MRI did not change (-0.9%, n=7), irrespective of run-in drug. Conclusions: Metabolic responses by FDG-PET compared to DCE-MRI changes reveal that the metabolic effects of RAD001 alone and in combination with cetuximab predominate, while antiangiogenic effects appear to be minimal in this patient population.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.