Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality obtained using low-dose and standard-dose 320-row temporal bone computed tomography (CT) in paediatric patients. Thirteen low-dose CT (120kV/50mAs) and nine standard-dose CT (120kV/100mAs) images from children up to 5years of age were compared for their image quality. The noise and signal-to-noise ratio for bone, fat and air were measured. Two observers assessed the overall image quality and ability to visualize 14 small anatomic structures using a 5-point scale, with a score of 3-5 indicating imaging of diagnostic quality. Noise was significantly higher and the signal-to-noise ratio was significantly lower with low-dose CT. Although the overall image quality and visibility of several structures on low-dose CT were significantly reduced when compared with standard-dose CT, all the image quality scores were 3 or >3. The dose-length products for low-dose CT and standard-dose CT were 59.6mGy·cm and 119.3mGy·cm, respectively. Low-dose CT of the temporal bone using 320-row CT provides images of diagnostic quality for assessment of middle and inner ear anatomy, similar to that provided by the standard-dose protocol, in spite of increased image noise.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call