Abstract

Detecting extranodal disease in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma is of great importance for both treatment and prognosis. Different imaging techniques can be used to identify these extranodal sites. This pictorial essay provides an overview of imaging features of extranodal disease manifestation in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma.

Highlights

  • Childhood Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the most curable paediatric cancers, with long-term survival rates above 90% for early stage disease [1]

  • Both wholebody magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and FDG-positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI have been investigated as alternatives to FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) for staging Hodgkin lymphoma, in order to reduce radiation dose to the patient [7,8,9,10,11]

  • The European guidelines for imaging in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma state that splenic involvement should be assumed if FDG-PET/CT positive lesions are confirmed by CT, MRI or US or if multiple small focal changes in the spleen structure are detected and suspicious for tumour, irrespective of the FDGPET/CT result [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Childhood Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the most curable paediatric cancers, with long-term survival rates above 90% for early stage disease [1]. CT computed tomography, FDG-PET 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, N/A not applicable an adult Hodgkin lymphoma study, whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/MRI were recently shown to have as comparable a diagnostic value as FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement [10, 17, 20, 21]. The current European guidelines for paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma state that focal FDG-PET positive lesions should be confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT, MRI or US to diagnose hepatic lymphoma involvement [2]. The European guidelines for imaging in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma state that splenic involvement should be assumed if FDG-PET/CT positive lesions are confirmed by CT, MRI or US or if multiple small focal changes in the spleen structure are detected and suspicious for tumour, irrespective of the FDGPET/CT result [2].

Conclusion
Findings
Conflicts of interest None
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.