Imaging doped silicon test structures using low energy electron microscopy.

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon
Take notes icon Take Notes

This document is the final SAND Report for the LDRD Project 105877 - 'Novel Diagnostic for Advanced Measurements of Semiconductor Devices Exposed to Adverse Environments' - funded through the Nanoscience to Microsystems investment area. Along with the continuous decrease in the feature size of semiconductor device structures comes a growing need for inspection tools with high spatial resolution and high sample throughput. Ideally, such tools should be able to characterize both the surface morphology and local conductivity associated with the structures. The imaging capabilities and wide availability of scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) make them an obvious choice for imaging device structures. Dopant contrast from pn junctions using secondary electrons in the SEM was first reported in 1967 and more recently starting in the mid-1990s. However, the serial acquisition process associated with scanning techniques places limits on the sample throughput. Significantly improved throughput is possible with the use of a parallel imaging scheme such as that found in photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM) and low energy electron microscopy (LEEM). The application of PEEM and LEEM to device structures relies on contrast mechanisms that distinguish differences in dopant type and concentration. Interestingly, one of the first applications of PEEM was a study ofmore » the doping of semiconductors, which showed that the PEEM contrast was very sensitive to the doping level and that dopant concentrations as low as 10{sup 16} cm{sup -3} could be detected. More recent PEEM investigations of Schottky contacts were reported in the late 1990s by Giesen et al., followed by a series of papers in the early 2000s addressing doping contrast in PEEM by Ballarotto and co-workers and Frank and co-workers. In contrast to PEEM, comparatively little has been done to identify contrast mechanisms and assess the capabilities of LEEM for imaging semiconductor device strictures. The one exception is the work of Mankos et al., who evaluated the impact of high-throughput requirements on the LEEM designs and demonstrated new applications of imaging modes with a tilted electron beam. To assess its potential as a semiconductor device imaging tool and to identify contrast mechanisms, we used LEEM to investigate doped Si test structures. In section 2, Imaging Oxide-Covered Doped Si Structures Using LEEM, we show that the LEEM technique is able to provide reasonably high contrast images across lateral pn junctions. The observed contrast is attributed to a work function difference ({Delta}{phi}) between the p- and n-type regions. However, because the doped regions were buried under a thermal oxide ({approx}3.5 nm thick), e-beam charging during imaging prevented quantitative measurements of {Delta}{phi}. As part of this project, we also investigated a series of similar test structures in which the thermal oxide was removed by a chemical etch. With the oxide removed, we obtained intensity-versus-voltage (I-V) curves through the transition from mirror to LEEM mode and determined the relative positions of the vacuum cutoffs for the differently doped regions. Although the details are not discussed in this report, the relative position in voltage of the vacuum cutoffs are a direct measure of the work function difference ({Delta}{phi}) between the p- and n-doped regions.« less

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1016/j.elspec.2023.147318
Development of in situ characterization of two-dimensional materials grown on insulator substrates with spectroscopic photoemission and low energy electron microscopy
  • Apr 1, 2023
  • Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
  • Guanhua Zhang + 9 more

Development of in situ characterization of two-dimensional materials grown on insulator substrates with spectroscopic photoemission and low energy electron microscopy

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 32
  • 10.1016/j.elspec.2012.03.002
Recent advances in imaging of properties and growth of low dimensional structures for photonics and electronics by XPEEM
  • Apr 3, 2012
  • Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
  • A.A Zakharov + 2 more

Recent advances in imaging of properties and growth of low dimensional structures for photonics and electronics by XPEEM

  • Book Chapter
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1007/978-3-540-85156-1_368
Low Energy Electron Microscopy: A 10 Year Outlook
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • Rudolf M Tromp

Low Energy Electron Microscopy (LEEM), and its close cousin Photo Electron Emission Microscopy (PEEM) have evolved from curiosities in the hands of physicists, to powerful tools for dynamic materials analysis. Invented in 1962, and first successfully realized in 1985, there are about 30 combined LEEM/PEEM instruments in the world today, in addition to about an equal number of PEEM-only instruments. Most of these instruments follow a design that is now almost 20 years old. The most advanced instruments are located at synchrotron radiation facilities, but they are relatively few in number, and not readily available to the general user. In the meantime, the field of electron microscopy is undergoing revolutionary advances fueled by dual breakthroughs in electron energy filtering and aberration correction. Similarly, the field of quantum optics is developing ever more powerful light sources in the Vacuum Ultra Violet (VUV) and soft X-ray ranges that do not depend on massive investments in national infrastructure (i.e. synchrotrons), but deliver their photons in a standard laboratory. These advances from two very different fields will combine to set the stage for the development of LEEM and PEEM over the next decade. Aberration correction will improve LEEM resolution from 5–10 nm today, to 1.5–2 nm in the near future, enough to resolve individual unit cells in the famous Si(111)-(7×7) surface, or -probably more important- sufficient to resolve the structure of nanoscale features such as magnetic domain walls. In PEEM the spatial resolution will improve from ∼ 20 nm today to 4–5 nm, while at the same time improving transmission by a factor ∼10. Energy filtering, today mostly used by synchrotron-based instruments, will be ubiquitous, powerful, simple, and relatively inexpensive.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 172
  • 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.03.005
A new aberration-corrected, energy-filtered LEEM/PEEM instrument. I. Principles and design
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • Ultramicroscopy
  • R.M Tromp + 5 more

A new aberration-corrected, energy-filtered LEEM/PEEM instrument. I. Principles and design

  • Book Chapter
  • 10.1016/b0-12-369401-9/00583-0
Low-Energy Electron Microscopy
  • Jan 1, 2005
  • E Bauer

Low-Energy Electron Microscopy

  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/s0424820100148368
Introduction to emission electron microscopy for the in situ study of surfaces
  • Aug 1, 1993
  • Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America
  • Martin E Kordesch

The Photoelectron Emission Microscope (PEEM) and Low Energy Electron Microscope (LEEM) are parallel-imaging electron microscopes with highly surface-sensitive image contrast mechanisms. In PEEM, the electron yield at the illumination wavelength determines image contrast, in LEEM, the intensity of low energy (< 100 eV) electrons back-diffracted from the surface, as well as interference effects, are responsible for image contrast. Mirror Electron Microscopy is also possible with the LEEM apparatus. In MEM, no electron penetration into the solid occurs, and an image of surface electronic potentials is obtained.While the emission microscope techniques named above are not high resolution methods, the unique contrast mechanisms, the ability to use thick single crystal samples, their compatibility with uhv surface science methods and new material-growth methods, coupled with real-time imaging capability, make them very useful.These microscopes do not depend on scanning probes, and some are compatible with pressures up to 10-3 Torr and specimen temperatures above 1300K.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 9
  • 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.021
Defocus in cathode lens instruments
  • Feb 24, 2017
  • Ultramicroscopy
  • R.M Tromp + 1 more

Defocus in cathode lens instruments

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 114
  • 10.1016/0304-3991(89)90033-8
Surface studies by low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM) and conventional UV photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM)
  • Sep 1, 1989
  • Ultramicroscopy
  • E Bauer + 3 more

Surface studies by low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM) and conventional UV photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM)

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 46
  • 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.11.005
A Contrast Transfer Function approach for image calculations in standard and aberration-corrected LEEM and PEEM
  • Nov 22, 2011
  • Ultramicroscopy
  • S.M Schramm + 3 more

A Contrast Transfer Function approach for image calculations in standard and aberration-corrected LEEM and PEEM

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 47
  • 10.1016/j.elspec.2012.08.001
A brief history of PEEM
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
  • Ernst Bauer

A brief history of PEEM

  • Book Chapter
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1007/3-540-45850-6_14
Photoelectron Spectroscopy with a Photoemission Electron Microscope
  • Jan 1, 2002
  • S Heun + 1 more

This article reviews laterally resolved x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) with a direct imaging photoemission electron microscope (PEEM). Applications of photoelectron spectroscopy with a sophisticated PEEM, a spectroscopic photoemission and low energy electron microscope (SPELEEM), are also given. The results of SPELEEM measurements from self-organized InAs nanocrystals are compared to conventional photoelectron spectral analyses. This comparison demonstrates that photoelectron spectroscopy with the SPELEEM is a reliable way to obtain information on the electronic structure of a sample from a sub-100 nm-sized area.KeywordsGaAs SubstrateCore LevelLateral ResolutionElectron Energy Loss SpectroscopyCore Level SpectrumThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 36
  • 10.1063/1.2748387
Characterization of spectroscopic photoemission and low energy electron microscope using multipolarized soft x rays at BL17SU/SPring-8
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • Review of Scientific Instruments
  • F Z Guo + 13 more

Spectroscopic photoemission and low energy electron microscope (SPELEEM) improved its performance after installation at BL17SU/SPring-8, where a multipolarization-mode undulator is employed to produce circularly and linearly polarized soft x rays. This undulator enables us to study the domain structures of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic materials by x-ray magnetic circular dichroism and x-ray magnetic linear dichroism. SPELEEM is used to study light elements (C, N, and O), 3d transition-metal elements and 4f rare earth elements, utilizing a wide range of photon energies. The two cylindrical mirrors adopted in front of SPELEEM ensure an illumination area of 14 x 14 microm(2) on the samples. The lateral resolution of a secondary electron photoemission electron microscope image is estimated to be better than 85 nm, whereas the energy resolution of the instrument is better than 0.4 eV.

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 15
  • 10.1007/s10562-017-2162-x
LEEM and PEEM as Probing Tools to Address Questions in Catalysis
  • Aug 14, 2017
  • Catalysis Letters
  • Mauricio J Prieto + 1 more

Catalysis is a hot topic in research with the focus on finding catalysts that show better activity or selectivity on processes on technological or industrial interest. The use of model systems of applicable materials has proven to be a successful approach in the last decades to obtain information on the fundamental properties of these materials, leading eventually to a better understanding how real catalysts work. This knowledge is extremely important in the sense that it allows an optimization of the catalyst composition, thus leading to a rational design of new materials. For these fundamental studies, a variety of probing techniques such as X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy, scanning tunnel microscopy, and temperature programmed desorption have been applied. In this article, we discuss how low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) and photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) can contribute to the fundamental understanding of relevant surface processes taking place on model catalysts. Also, the capability of these techniques on addressing open questions in catalysis is discussed.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 46
  • 10.1063/1.4801968
Full field electron spectromicroscopy applied to ferroelectric materials
  • May 8, 2013
  • Journal of Applied Physics
  • N Barrett + 17 more

The application of PhotoEmission Electron Microscopy (PEEM) and Low Energy Electron Microscopy (LEEM) techniques to the study of the electronic and chemical structures of ferroelectric materials is reviewed. Electron optics in both techniques gives spatial resolution of a few tens of nanometres. PEEM images photoelectrons, whereas LEEM images reflected and elastically backscattered electrons. Both PEEM and LEEM can be used in direct and reciprocal space imaging. Together, they provide access to surface charge, work function, topography, chemical mapping, surface crystallinity, and band structure. Examples of applications for the study of ferroelectric thin films and single crystals are presented.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 40
  • 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.09.002
Medipix 2 detector applied to low energy electron microscopy
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • Ultramicroscopy
  • R Van Gastel + 6 more

Medipix 2 detector applied to low energy electron microscopy

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
  • Ask R Discovery Star icon
  • Chat PDF Star icon

AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.