Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessReview ArticlesImaginary Science1David GoodingDavid GoodingScience Studies Centre, University of BathBath, BA2 7AY, UK Search for more articles by this author 1Review of Roy A. Sorensen [1992], Thought Experiments, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, pp. xxii + 318; T. Horowitz and G. J. Massey (eds) [1991], Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Savage, M. D., Rowman & Littlefield, pp. ix + 355; James Robert Brown [1991], The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences, London and New York, Routledge, pp. xi + 175.PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Volume 45, Number 4December 1994 Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.4.1029 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref © 1994 by The Author. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Yiftach Fehige The Annus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11, no.11 (Mar 2021): 222–240.https://doi.org/10.1086/712941Tamar Szabó Gendler Galileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, no.33 (Dec 2020): 397–424.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/49.3.397

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call