Abstract

AbstractCritics of Felicia Hemans often discuss her historiography, observing that her poetry injects the domestic, the feminine, and the sentimental into “official” history.1 This essay suggests that Hemans's historiography was neither entirely novel nor purely oppositional, but rather a manifestation of a widespread Romantic‐era conviction that history was not merely something to read about, but also an experience to be felt and a place to be visited. In their engagements with the dead and their concomitant interest in imaginative historical transport, many of Hemans's poems highlight tensions between ideals of affective proximity and critical distance that troubled Romantic‐era historians and continue to vex historicist critics. Thus, this essay takes Hemans as a case study in the methodological difficulties of memorialization, especially in the New Historicist project.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.